Yet another new layout? That was fast… or maybe I’m just really slow at reviewing. In any case, I liked the last layout [the bold, green one] and I like this one as well. It’s an interesting combination of colors, and what’s more: it actually looks nice. It’s rare to find a designer who is able to pull off putting orange and green next to each other. The layout is vibrant and bold, a good combination.
Site: Miss Misfit
Type: Personal
Owner: Lindsey
Reviewed By: Sanosuke
Date Received: 11/3/06
Date Completed: 1/11/07
Preview
I’ve mentioned before that I like your layout; I’m not going to waste time nit-picking at it, seeing as that’s not my forte. The overall layout looks well-balanced; might I suggest though, a change in the footer? Since the header has the black-outline/white background protruding out at the very top, why not make the footer the same way? It’d look more balanced; here’s an example:

I’m currently using an 800 x 600 resolution with IE 6 as my only browser… your layout has a gap in it in IE 6:

I fiddled around with your coding, and I dont’ think you need the following coding:
<!--[if lte IE 6]>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" xhref="/wp-content/themes/twosides/iestyle.css" mce_href="/wp-content/themes/twosides/iestyle.css" />
<![endif]-->
You also have a problem with your blockquotes, at least in IE 6:

It occurs because of your padding; adding padding to the top and bottom makes the content below it move. If you changed padding: 0.5em; to padding: 0 0.5em; for your blockquote, it would work.
After reading the first two pages or so, I’ve realized that your sentences are usually really short and list-like. [That’s like me saying “I’ve realized your sentences are short. I’ve realized your sentences are list-like.”] They’re repeatative. [Though, my example was slightly stretched.] I don’t want to completely rewrite your site for you, as me expressing your thoughts and you doing so aren’t the same thing, but I do suggest going back, rereading your pages, and rewritting a few things and combining more sentences. [Make them fuller, not so short and broken.] I’ve combined few sentences in your General Information page, and I didn’t bother doing so afterwards; these aren’t, you must do this or anything though, just suggestions.
It’s interesting that you have your school schedule up, but for those of us who don’t go to your school, it might seem a bit confusing. For example, I have four periods a day, and it seems that you have 10? [And you’re taking Algebra and Calculus at the same time?] It might be helpful to explain your schedule a bit if you’re going to have it up. [For example, what are the blanks for? What is “internet”? What’s “club”?]
Also, the way you have the tables set up is a bit confusing to read. There are no borders, and the words are crowded together. I would also suggest centering the table and making each column the same size to add more organization. [If you’re going to make the columns the same size, Organic Chemisty might have to be abbreviated to OC.]
So, instead of what you have now, try for the first few lines of your coding:
<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" width="90%" border=”1″ align=”center”>
<tr>
<td width=”18%”><b>Monday</b></td>
<td width=”18%”><b>Tuesday</b></td>
<td width=”18%”><b>Wednesday</b></td>
<td width=”18%”><b>Thursday</b></td>
<td width=”18%”><b>Friday</b></td>
</tr>
And the rest can remain the same.
Music files tend to take up a lot of bandwidth when directly downloaded, and I don’t recommend allowing people to directly listen to music. Then again, I’m one of those people with a terribly old and slow computer; and clicking on a music file would not only take forever for it to load, it might potentially blow up my computer.
I suggest saving the files in a .zip file instead and allowing people to download that way.
There’s also an inconsistancy in the way you’ve displayed your files. The first two sections [you singing and you singing with the piano] have the file size contained within the link [i.e. Link (# MB)] but the last category [you playing the piano] has the file size outside of the link [i.e. Link (#MB)]
It would be nice if the site you won the challenge from was listed as well. Something more like this, perhaps.
Your articles were interesting reads, but I felt they lacked details. If you’re going to take the time to type up an article to try to help others, why not add more helpful details? A lot of times, the only reasoning you use for justifying your points is, “other people don’t like it.” [For example, I personally like sites with text justification because I like the neater, cleaner look; so I wouldn’t have taken your text alignment article seriously. Are there any other reasons why people should align their text to the left? And how would you be able to dictate what the ‘majority of people’ like?]
I would also suggest more examples [text, link, or graphical.] Compare and contrast things visually. [”This is what your site looks like with this size font; this is what it looks like with a bigger sized font.”]
Separating your styling from your content
Overdoing your images - It’d be great if you used examples of other sites for people to look at. [”This is an example of a site with minimal graphics that still looks nice.”] It might also be useful if you mentioned the side-effects to having huge headers, since ‘it doesn’t always look nicer’ usually isn’t someone’s main concern in making graphics. [It wouldn’t load properly would be one reason, another would be the fact that people with smaller resolutions wouldn’t be able to view the full site.]
Image Quality vs. Speed - it’s interesting to read about the different formats, but it would be recommended that if you’re writing an article, you should explain more. For example, what is optimization? Why should people do it, versus just normal saving? I was under the impression that articles were to help others, not make them look up stuff on their own.
Text Size - It might be helpful to specify how big each size looks as an example, so people know what they’re putting on their site without having to experiment with different sizes.
Navigation
Header Images - Okay, so the ideal height is 300px or 400px; why is that a good size? What about making them smaller? And what about the width of a header image? How big should those be?
Splash Pages - There are a lot of sites that use splash pages for other purposes. Brenda of Little Wonder gives a good explaination of why she has a splash page on her site. Other sites like Ainoyume.net use splash pages for different versions of their sites. Instead of just saying it’s useless, perhaps you should elaborate on how it’s useless. [For example, if my site only worked in one browser, why shouldn’t I have a splash page?]
Tables vs. Divs
Your article’s introduction claims that it will be about the different types of sites in ‘our little online community’, but you’ve only addressed two different types of sites. You don’t actually speak of product/site differentiation until the last two paragraphs when you start addressing WPRs. The article might’ve been more properly named “Differenciation between Personal and Graphic sites” or something of that nature, because the current name is slightly misleading.
It would be nice if you specified some rules for hosting or preferences you have, seeing as you’re probably not going to take any site that applies for hosting. For example, if I were to apply for hosting for my only site, do I have to have two other samples of my work in order to apply, what kinds of stuff are considered ’samples’ [can I give you three icons I made, or do they have to be three layouts?] It is better to list conditions and requirements first, rather than have the visitor/applicant sit and wonder.
Layouts Archive - The way everything is laid out on this site right now is cluttered. After scrolling for a long time, I had a hard time telling where one layout started and the other ended. Perhaps it might be easier to list everything with the image aligned to the left and the text to the right; similar to how our site thumbnail previews above look. It might also be helpful for you to provide image credits [and any other credits] when applicable, seeing as I highly doubt you took all those pictures by yourself.
Awards - I think I mentioned this before, but linking the site where you got the award from would be nice.
Credits and Resources - More information to the links [especially the FamFamFam one] would be nice; what kind of help did these sites provide for you? [Ex: what did Akismet do? How did Hybrid Gensis help you?] An example of a really well-built credits page is this one, notice how she lists the reasons each site is on her page.
Avatars - As someone who likes viewing other people’s avatars, I’ve always found a preference for viewing them in bulk instead of by category. This is merely a suggestion, but perhaps a “view all” page would be a nice addition, for those of us who just like browsing.
Color Schemes - While you have a lot of very pretty color schemes, I’m not sure how people would be able to use them. Perhaps adding the hex codes to each color would be a better way of displaying these color schemes.
Overall, I found this site a very interesting read. There’s a lot of information here, ranging from very personal to visitor-centric. I would suggest, however, restructuring your sentences a bit more for an easier read and perhaps adding more detailed credits [especially on your Layouts Archive page.]
Lindsey Says:
January 14th, 2007 at 3:45 amThanks for reviewing me. I’ve added it to my website together with my replies on this page:
http://www.miss-misfit.com/domain/site-reviews/review-by-sanosuke/